Global trade stalls when context gets lost. Truo keeps it moving.

A cotton bed linen export from India to the EU: Sahyadri Textiles Pvt Ltd ships through Nhava Sheva (JNPA) to Ostgaard Import BV in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Parties, values and dates are illustrative. Maersk's published India–North Europe service documents both ports; the demo is not a live sailing schedule.

The record connects Indian export documents, carriage and insurance under CIP Rotterdam terminal (Incoterms® 2020), and the EU buyer's import review. The importer and broker confirm classification, origin and textile fibre labelling; the carrier and any house-level filer coordinate ICS2 entry summary data. Truo keeps that evidence attached to the trade.

A trade operating system for exporters and their counterparties. It carries a trade from lead capture through order, export and import execution, and trade compliance in one record — so the commercial context, the operational state and the compliance evidence stay attached to the same thread. The exporter holds the licence; the EU buyer, the broker and the reviewer are invited into the individual trade case.

All three are operating layers over one shared trade record. That is the point: the layers are not separate products stitched together with integrations, and none of them owns a private copy of the truth.

If you only need a sales CRM, a general-purpose one will serve you better. Truo Trade earns its place when a deal has to become a governed, moving shipment.

Yes. Most teams begin at the commercial-to-execution handoff, because that is where context is most often lost. The record model means later layers attach to work already captured rather than requiring a re-import.

Truo Trade is designed to sit alongside an existing ERP, forwarder portals and document stores. The approved integration list, the direction each one moves data, and its support status are published on the integrations page once each has been verified.

Not today, and not as the lender when we do. A partner-led capability is in development: Truo Trade would assemble the dossier, prefill the lender's application and track conditions and status, while a regulated bank, NBFC, factor or ITFS platform owns eligibility, pricing, the decision, disbursement and collections.

A readiness check will say ready to apply. It will never say approved, and money will not move through Truo Trade.

They are separate fields on the record. A screening or classification result stores its source, scope, time and confidence. A human decision stores the responsible reviewer, the basis and the outcome.

The interface never merges them, and a recorded result never claims to replace customs, legal or compliance judgement.

It is mapped onto the record model during implementation, with the migration path agreed before any import runs. The specific approach depends on your current systems and is scoped during the product tour.

Access is controlled by role-based permissions with an append-only audit history of who changed what and when. Hosting locations, retention periods, encryption detail and data residency options are answered in writing during evaluation, and will be published here once verified.

This is scoped against your systems and volumes rather than quoted as a headline number. A verified implementation timeline will be published here when there is enough delivery evidence to state one honestly.